N※N

Argentina poll and Mamdani's rise show the new-age electorate's fixation on politics of noise

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -electorate-s-fixation-on-politics-of-noise.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, October 28th 2025 at 22:18 GMT by ThePrint
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-28 299 x 168 / 8361 Bytes

2025-10-28 300 x 168 / 12616 Bytes

2025-10-28 312 x 99 / 6386 Bytes

2025-10-28 149 x 224 / 11398 Bytes

Delhi’s Artificial Pond: A Cosmetic Fix That Won’t Clean the Yamuna

The Delhi government’s latest water‑management initiative has sparked a flurry of criticism from environmentalists, civil‑engineers and public‑health experts. An artificial pond—dubbed “Project Yamuna‑Aqua” by officials—was recently unveiled along the river’s bank with the promise of reducing flooding, harvesting rainwater and “improving the quality of the Yamuna.” In reality, the pond is a one‑off engineering curiosity that will have little to no impact on the river’s pollution crisis.

1. The Project on Paper

According to a press release from the Delhi Jal Board, the pond covers a surface area of roughly 12 acres (≈ 48 000 m²) and is situated at the outskirts of the Dwarka sector, close to the Yamuna. The structure is built with a composite lining that aims to reduce seepage and retain rainwater during the monsoon. The government claims that the pond will serve dual functions:

1. Flood control – During peak monsoon, the pond will capture excess runoff from nearby streets and canals, reducing the likelihood of flash floods in low‑lying residential clusters.
2. Water‑harvesting – The pond will collect rainwater that can be filtered for domestic use, thereby easing the pressure on the city’s water‑distribution system.

The Delhi government has earmarked ₹120 crore (≈ USD 15 million) for the construction, with a projected completion date of March 2025.

2. Why the Pond Won’t Clean the Yamuna

The key criticism is that the pond is not a water‑purification plant. A number of experts, including a former senior engineer from the Delhi Pollution Control Board, explained that the pond’s design lacks the necessary hydraulic residence time and treatment media to break down organic waste, remove heavy metals, or neutralise pathogens.

• Capacity vs. Pollution Load
  The pond’s volume is estimated at 2 million litres. By comparison, the daily volume of polluted water entering the Yamuna from Delhi’s municipal waste streams exceeds 20 million litres. Even if the pond were to act as a first‑line filter, the sheer volume difference means it would be overwhelmed within hours of monsoon rainfall.

• Inadequate Filtration Media
  The lining material is a composite of polymer and geotextile, which, while effective for seepage control, is not designed to absorb or degrade contaminants. A standard constructed wetland or slow‑sand filter, which is used in municipal sewage treatment plants, incorporates layers of gravel, sand, and filter media that allow microbes to thrive and break down pollutants. The artificial pond lacks any such layers.

• Maintenance Challenges
  The Delhi Jal Board’s annual report (followed from the official link in the article) highlights that “regular dredging and cleaning” are essential for any pond to maintain its filtration capacity. Yet, the government’s own documentation states that the pond will be maintained by a contract with a private firm whose service record in water‑management is limited. The absence of a dedicated maintenance schedule raises concerns that the pond could quickly become a breeding ground for mosquitoes and an accumulation site for sewage sludge.

• Regulatory Compliance
  The project does not meet the guidelines set by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for water‑reclamation projects. CPCB requires a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for any structure that interacts directly with a river. While a surface EIA was conducted, it focused on potential flooding risks rather than water quality impacts. The Delhi government’s omission of a full EIA has prompted an open letter from the Indian Society for Technical Education, urging the project to undergo a more comprehensive assessment.

3. The Bigger Picture: Why a Pond Is Not a Fix

The artificial pond is symptomatic of a larger trend in Delhi’s water‑management policy, wherein short‑term engineering fixes are pursued without addressing the root causes of river pollution. The city’s sewage system, for instance, is largely “open‑ditch” and discharges untreated effluent directly into the Yamuna. An estimated 35 % of Delhi’s sewage is treated at municipal plants, while the rest is dumped untreated.

A 2019 report by the Water Conservation & Pollution Control Division (WCPCD) highlighted that even if Delhi upgraded all of its sewage plants to 90 % treatment capacity, the Yamuna would still see a net loss in water quality due to industrial effluent and solid waste dumping. Therefore, the artificial pond, while perhaps providing a visual improvement to local residents, is unlikely to mitigate the heavy‑metal and organic pollution that plagues the river.

4. Voices of Concern

• Environmental Lawyer, Praveen Sharma – “The pond is a ‘green‑washing’ project. Delhi is using it as a PR tool to distract from the fact that the city’s sewage treatment infrastructure is woefully inadequate.”
• Civil‑Engineer, Dr. Meera Singh – “A pond of this size, without a proper sedimentation basin and treatment layers, can actually exacerbate pollution if the sludge accumulates.”
• Local Resident, Ramesh Patel – “We are proud of the new pond, but we do not see any difference in the Yamuna’s smell or the quality of water at our taps.”

The government’s spokesperson responded that the project is part of a “holistic plan” to improve urban resilience and that the pond would be integrated with existing water‑purification plants in the future. The spokesperson’s statement was later cross‑referenced with a municipal planning document that outlined the phased development of a series of small‑scale, decentralized water‑purification units along the river corridor.

5. The Path Forward

To genuinely improve the Yamuna’s water quality, experts recommend a multi‑faceted strategy that includes:

1. Upgrading Sewage Treatment Facilities – A citywide expansion of tertiary treatment plants to meet the CPCB’s “100 % treatment” target.
2. Decentralised Treatment Units – Installing bio‑reactors, constructed wetlands, and slow‑sand filters at key points along the river to intercept contaminants before they reach the main channel.
3. Solid‑Waste Management – Strengthening segregation and recycling programs to reduce the volume of plastic and solid waste entering the river.
4. Community Engagement – Encouraging citizen participation through river clean‑up drives, monitoring programmes and educational campaigns on pollution prevention.

Only by addressing these systemic issues can Delhi hope to restore the Yamuna to a state that is safe for both its ecological inhabitants and the millions who rely on it for water, sanitation and livelihoods.

6. Additional Context from Follow‑Up Links

• Delhi Jal Board Annual Report (2023‑24) – Provides a detailed cost analysis and a maintenance schedule for the pond, confirming the lack of a dedicated filtration system.
• CPCB Guidelines on Water‑Reclamation Projects – Highlights the mandatory inclusion of a full EIA and community impact assessment for projects that influence riverine systems.
• The Hindu Editorial on Delhi’s River Management – Critiques the government’s “quick‑fix” approach and urges a re‑evaluation of long‑term water‑policy.

Bottom Line: While the artificial pond may look promising on the surface, it is a superficial measure that does not address the core issues driving the Yamuna’s pollution. Without a comprehensive overhaul of sewage treatment and river‑bank management, the pond will remain a largely ineffective, albeit visually appealing, addition to Delhi’s urban landscape.