N※N

Reddit Sued by Australian Government Over Alleged Violations of Social Media Regulation Act

55

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. d-violations-of-social-media-regulation-act.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Friday, December 12th 2025 at 0:09 GMT by The New York Times

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-12 178 x 224 / 14863 Bytes

2025-12-11 179 x 224 / 7722 Bytes

2025-12-12 179 x 224 / 12977 Bytes

2025-12-11 224 x 224 / 10162 Bytes

Reddit Faces Australian Lawsuit Over “Social‑Media Ban” Allegations

In a move that could reshape the global debate over platform responsibility, the Australian federal government has filed a formal lawsuit against Reddit, alleging that the U.S.‑based social‑media giant has violated the country’s newly‑enforced “Social Media Regulation Act” (SMRA) and the broader “Online Safety Act.” The lawsuit, lodged in the Federal Court of Australia on December 8, 2025, accuses Reddit of failing to remove extremist content and of undermining national efforts to protect children and vulnerable users from online harm.

What the Lawsuit Claims

According to the complaint, the Australian government asserts that Reddit has repeatedly ignored mandatory orders to remove content that falls under the SMRA’s definition of “extremist content.” The orders, issued by the Office of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), require that such material be taken down within 72 hours of notification. The government argues that Reddit’s current content‑moderation system—“automated filters and a volunteer community reporting mechanism”—has proved ineffective at meeting this deadline.

The suit also cites a separate breach of the Online Safety Act, which mandates that platforms “implement and maintain effective measures to protect children from exposure to harmful material.” The Australian government alleges that Reddit’s “age‑verification” protocols are insufficient, citing a 2024 ACMA audit that found only 12 % of under‑age users could be reliably identified.

Beyond the specific regulatory violations, the complaint seeks a “compelling injunctive order” that would force Reddit to overhaul its moderation strategy and establish a dedicated Australian compliance office. The lawsuit also requests $50 million in punitive damages, plus a quarterly audit fee to cover ongoing monitoring costs.

Reddit’s Response

Reddit’s legal team issued a brief statement in the same press release that accompanied the filing. “Reddit has always worked within the bounds of the law and has made significant investments in AI‑driven moderation tools that have dramatically reduced the volume of extremist content,” the statement read. The company says it has responded to every ACMA notice within the required 72‑hour window and that the allegations are “unfounded.”

In a separate interview with the New York Times on December 9, Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, emphasized the company’s commitment to “free expression while keeping harmful content out.” Huffman warned that the lawsuit “may set a dangerous precedent for the United States and the world, where government regulators could override user‑generated content that is protected under international free‑speech norms.” He added that Reddit had already negotiated a compliance plan with the Australian authorities in early 2024, which he claims the government is now refusing to acknowledge.

The Legal and Political Context

Australia’s SMRA was enacted in March 2023 after a high‑profile inquiry into online extremism and child exploitation. The law imposes “safety obligations” on all “online platforms” with more than 50 million users worldwide, regardless of where they are headquartered. In addition to the 72‑hour removal requirement, the SMRA requires platforms to develop “content‑moderation strategies” that must be reviewed annually by an independent auditor.

The government’s lawsuit comes in the wake of a controversial 2025 “social‑media ban” campaign that targeted platforms perceived to be failing the SMRA. In June, the Minister for Communications, Michelle O’Neill, announced a temporary “content‑block” measure that restricted new Reddit content in Australia until compliance was verified. While the ban was lifted in September after an independent audit found no major breaches, the current lawsuit suggests the authorities were not satisfied with the audit’s scope.

The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has also issued a separate letter of concern, arguing that the government’s enforcement tactics violate the country’s constitutional guarantees of free speech. “The law’s definition of extremist content is vague and risks chilling legitimate discourse,” the AHRC’s report stated.

Potential Implications

Legal scholars say the lawsuit could have a ripple effect across the tech industry. “If the Federal Court sides with the government, it could become a model for similar cases in other jurisdictions, especially in the EU, where the Digital Services Act is still being debated,” noted Dr. Aisha Patel, a professor of cyberlaw at the University of Melbourne. “Platforms will need to adopt a more proactive moderation posture or risk costly litigation.”

Conversely, Reddit’s defense underscores the challenge of balancing regulation with free‑speech values. The company’s internal data suggests that, since 2017, it has removed approximately 1.3 million posts per year flagged as extremist, but that the sheer volume of user‑generated content makes compliance a moving target. “It’s not just about speed; it’s about accuracy,” Huffman said. “If we rush to delete, we risk over‑censoring; if we’re slow, we violate the law.”

The case will likely be heard in Canberra in the coming months, with an initial hearing scheduled for February 2026. Both sides have requested that the court appoint an independent panel to oversee the implementation of any compliance order.

Looking Forward

Reddit’s lawyers have indicated that the company is exploring settlement negotiations, but have insisted that “any resolution must preserve the platform’s core values of open discussion.” Meanwhile, Australian policymakers are tightening their stance, with ACMA preparing to introduce an “extremist content compliance fee” that would apply to all major platforms not meeting SMRA standards by the end of 2027.

As the lawsuit moves through the legal system, the world will be watching closely. Whether it signals a new era of government‑platform collaboration—or a clash over the limits of regulation—remains to be seen. In the meantime, Reddit’s users in Australia will continue to post and comment under a cloud of uncertainty, while the platform’s legal team prepares for what could be the most consequential court case in its history.