N※N

New Book Argues Cities Must Move Towards a "Car-Light" Future

78

  //automotive-transportation.news-articles.net/co .. cities-must-move-towards-a-car-light-future.html
  Published in Automotive and Transportation on Saturday, January 3rd 2026 at 6:24 GMT by Philadelphia Inquirer

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2026-01-03 179 x 224 / 6023 Bytes

2026-01-03 224 x 224 / 15290 Bytes

2026-01-03 179 x 224 / 6710 Bytes

2026-01-03 232 x 217 / 10455 Bytes

Rethinking Urban Spaces: “Life After Cars” Argues Cities Must Embrace a Car-Light Future

The automobile, once heralded as the key to progress and personal freedom, is increasingly being recognized as a significant obstacle to thriving, equitable cities. A new book, "Life After Cars: How Planning Can Save Cities," by urban planner Carlos Moreno and journalist Todd Litman, argues that cities need to radically rethink their infrastructure and planning priorities to move towards a “car-light” future – one where vehicles are still present but play a significantly reduced role in daily life. A recent interview with Moreno and Litman, published by The Philadelphia Inquirer, sheds light on the book's core arguments and offers a roadmap for how cities can navigate this necessary transition.

For decades, urban planning has been dominated by the "parking paradigm," prioritizing space for cars over people, public transit, cycling, and pedestrian infrastructure. This prioritization, Moreno argues, is not only inefficient but actively detrimental to city life. The book draws on Moreno's “30-minute city” concept – a vision where residents can access essential services, work, education, recreation, and social connections within a 15-minute walk or bike ride (or a 30-minute trip using public transportation). The current car-centric model, conversely, often forces people to spend hours commuting and navigating congested roads.

The interview highlights several key points from the book. Firstly, reclaiming parking spaces is paramount. Parking lots and on-street parking occupy an enormous amount of urban land – roughly 30% in many cities. This space could be repurposed for housing, parks, bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and other amenities that enhance quality of life. The book doesn’t advocate for a complete ban on cars but suggests drastically reducing the number of spaces allocated to them, encouraging alternative modes of transportation through pricing strategies (like congestion charges) and improved infrastructure. As Litman points out, "parking is free in most places," effectively subsidizing car use at the expense of other priorities.

Secondly, investing heavily in public transit is critical. While many cities have struggled with underfunded and unreliable public transportation systems, Moreno and Litman argue that robust, frequent, and affordable options are essential to incentivize people to leave their cars behind. This isn't just about expanding existing lines; it's also about creating more localized, neighborhood-level transit solutions like bus rapid transit (BRT) and microtransit services. The interview notes the success of cities like Curitiba, Brazil – a pioneer in BRT systems – as an example of how effective public transportation can be in shaping urban development.

Thirdly, prioritizing active transportation—walking and cycling—is crucial for both health and environmental sustainability. The book emphasizes creating safe and inviting environments for pedestrians and cyclists through wider sidewalks, protected bike lanes, traffic calming measures, and pedestrian-only zones. This requires shifting the focus from vehicle speed to people’s safety and comfort. The article references research showing that walkable neighborhoods are more desirable and contribute to higher property values – a compelling argument for policymakers hesitant to prioritize non-car users.

The authors acknowledge that transitioning to a car-light future won't be easy. Resistance from drivers is inevitable, as is the political challenge of reallocating resources away from car infrastructure. They also recognize the importance of addressing equity concerns. Car ownership tends to be higher among wealthier populations, and policies aimed at reducing car use must not disproportionately burden low-income communities who may rely on cars for essential travel. Solutions include providing affordable transit options, ensuring access to jobs in walkable neighborhoods, and offering subsidies for electric vehicles or shared mobility services.

The interview also touches upon the role of technology. While acknowledging the potential of autonomous vehicles, Moreno and Litman caution against assuming they will automatically solve urban transportation problems. They argue that if autonomous vehicles continue to prioritize individual car ownership, they could exacerbate congestion and sprawl. Instead, they advocate for integrating autonomous technology into shared mobility systems – robotaxis and self-driving buses – that can contribute to a more efficient and sustainable transportation network.

The book's release comes at a time when many cities are grappling with challenges related to traffic congestion, air pollution, climate change, and social equity. Philadelphia itself is facing these issues, as highlighted in the article’s introduction regarding the city's ongoing debates about parking minimums and pedestrian safety. The “Life After Cars” framework offers a compelling vision for how Philadelphia – and other cities around the world – can create more livable, sustainable, and equitable urban environments by fundamentally rethinking their relationship with the automobile. It is not a call to eliminate cars entirely but rather to strategically reduce their dominance and prioritize people-centered design principles that foster thriving communities. The authors' message is clear: embracing a car-light future isn’t just desirable; it’s essential for the long-term health and vitality of our cities.

I hope this article provides a thorough summary of the Inquirer piece and its key takeaways!