Top and Current
Source : (remove) : LA Times
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Top and Current
Source : (remove) : LA Times
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Mon, March 9, 2026
Sat, March 7, 2026
Wed, March 4, 2026
Tue, March 3, 2026
Mon, March 2, 2026
Wed, February 25, 2026
Tue, February 24, 2026
Mon, February 23, 2026
Sun, February 22, 2026
Fri, February 20, 2026
Thu, February 19, 2026
Wed, February 18, 2026
Sat, February 14, 2026
Fri, February 13, 2026
Tue, February 10, 2026
Mon, February 9, 2026
Sun, February 8, 2026
Mon, February 2, 2026
Sun, February 1, 2026
Sat, January 31, 2026
Wed, January 28, 2026
Fri, January 23, 2026
Tue, January 13, 2026
Thu, January 8, 2026
Sat, December 13, 2025
Mon, December 1, 2025
Sun, November 23, 2025
Tue, November 18, 2025
Mon, November 17, 2025
Sun, November 16, 2025
Tue, October 28, 2025
Fri, September 5, 2025
Wed, August 20, 2025
Sun, August 17, 2025
Wed, August 13, 2025
Sun, August 10, 2025
Tue, August 5, 2025

Newsom's Shadow Campaign: Positioning for 2028?

  Copy link into your clipboard //health-fitness.news-articles.net/content/2026/ .. wsom-s-shadow-campaign-positioning-for-2028.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Health and Fitness on by LA Times
      Locales: California, New York, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES

Newsom's Shadow Campaign: A 2024 Preview & Potential 2028 Launchpad

California Governor Gavin Newsom's increasingly public confrontations with both Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. aren't simply isolated political squabbles. They represent a fascinating, and potentially crucial, early proxy war for the 2024 presidential election, but more importantly, a clear signalling of Newsom's ambitions beyond his current role. While he maintains he won't be on the ballot in 2024, his actions suggest a strategic positioning for future national leadership, potentially setting the stage for a 2028 presidential run.

The dynamic has become particularly intriguing due to the unusual nature of the attacks. Newsom's clashes with Trump are predictable - a continuation of the established political antagonism between California's progressive governor and the former Republican president. However, his aggressive engagement with Kennedy, a fellow Democrat, is far less conventional. Newsom isn't simply debating policy; he's actively dismantling Kennedy's arguments, particularly concerning vaccines and the war in Ukraine, with a level of intensity usually reserved for opposing party candidates.

Newsom's vocal criticism of Kennedy centers around what he views as dangerous misinformation. Kennedy's long-held vaccine skepticism, amplified by his presidential campaign, directly clashes with established scientific consensus and public health recommendations. Similarly, his nuanced - and often criticized - position on the war in Ukraine diverges significantly from the Biden administration's staunch support for Kyiv. Newsom, in his interview on Hugh Hewitt's show, framed his interventions as a necessary defense of truth and reason. He positioned himself as the "adult in the room," explicitly labeling Kennedy's stances as "disturbing, offensive, [and] harmful."

Kennedy's response has been equally pointed, accusing Newsom of being entrenched within a "deep state" apparatus and suppressing dissenting opinions. This accusation, while not unexpected from a candidate running as an anti-establishment figure, highlights the deep ideological divide at play. It's a battle over not just specific policies, but the very definition of truth and the role of government. The rhetoric mirrors themes prominent in the 2016 and 2020 elections, suggesting a potential repeat of information warfare tactics in 2024.

While Newsom consistently denies any plans to challenge President Biden in 2024, his actions strongly suggest a broader strategy. As Mark Murray of NBC News points out, Newsom has a significant stake in shaping the Democratic narrative and influencing the selection of the nominee. By actively engaging in these debates, he's not only defining himself against certain viewpoints but also subtly outlining a vision for the future of the Democratic Party.

The implications extend beyond 2024. These clashes are a preview of the key battlegrounds that will likely define the 2024 election cycle and beyond. Trump, known for his combative style, will undoubtedly continue to attack his opponents relentlessly. Kennedy, aiming to disrupt the established order, will likely maintain his challenge to mainstream narratives. Newsom's role is to position himself as the pragmatic alternative, the experienced leader who can offer a stable and informed counterpoint to both extremes.

However, Newsom's strategy is not without risk. By diving headfirst into these culture wars, he risks alienating moderate voters who may view his attacks as unnecessarily divisive. A perceived overemphasis on these contentious issues could also damage his image as a capable administrator focused on practical solutions to California's challenges. Some analysts suggest that by becoming too associated with defending the status quo, he may inadvertently reinforce the "establishment" label that Kennedy is actively trying to dismantle.

Ultimately, Newsom's current activity reads as a carefully orchestrated long-term strategy. While he may not be directly competing for the presidency in 2024, he's building a national profile, solidifying his ideological position within the Democratic Party, and testing the waters for a potential run in 2028. He's effectively using the current election cycle as a platform to establish himself as a viable alternative to both the Trumpian right and the more progressive wings of the Democratic Party. The ongoing spectacle, therefore, is not just about 2024 - it's a glimpse into the future of American politics and the potential rise of Gavin Newsom as a major national force.


Read the Full LA Times Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/newsoms-fight-trump-rfk-jr-100000759.html ]