N※N

Bipartisan Push Tightens STOCK Act with Real-Time Disclosure and Cool-Off Periods

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. h-real-time-disclosure-and-cool-off-periods.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Wednesday, November 19th 2025 at 11:23 GMT by NBC Washington

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-19 224 x 224 / 13950 Bytes

2025-08-23 179 x 224 / 5009 Bytes

2025-11-19 187 x 224 / 15879 Bytes

2025-11-19 187 x 224 / 12045 Bytes

Bipartisan Push to Strengthen the STOCK Act: A Look at the New Proposals

The United States has long struggled with the uneasy relationship between lawmakers and the financial markets. The 2012 “Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge” (STOCK) Act was a landmark attempt to curb insider trading among members of Congress, federal staff, and other government officials. Yet, in the years since its passage, critics have argued that the law has been poorly enforced and has failed to deter several high‑profile trading scandals. The latest development in this ongoing debate was reported by NBC Washington in a video‑based news story that aired on March 3, 2023. The piece highlighted a new bipartisan effort aimed at tightening the STOCK Act’s provisions and ensuring that congressional trading is both transparent and accountable.

The Core of the Proposals

In the NBC Washington video, several senators and representatives—representatives from both parties—lined up to introduce an amendment package that would dramatically overhaul the current enforcement mechanisms of the STOCK Act. The primary points of the proposal include:

1. Immediate Disclosure – Current regulations allow lawmakers to file their stock trades within 45 days of the transaction. The new proposal pushes for disclosure within 24 hours, ensuring that any potential conflict of interest is visible to the public in real time.

2. Mandatory “Cool‑off” Periods – The amendment would require a 30‑day waiting period before lawmakers can trade securities that are directly linked to pending legislation or executive branch actions. This is designed to reduce the perception that lawmakers are using privileged information for personal gain.

3. Stricter Penalties – The amendment proposes the introduction of civil penalties up to 10% of the value of the ill‑timed trade, and criminal charges for repeated violations. This marks a significant departure from the largely civil fines that have historically been imposed.

4. Independent Oversight Panel – A bipartisan panel within the Office of the Government Ethics would be empowered to review and investigate potential violations, with the authority to refer cases to the SEC or the Department of Justice.

5. Public Reporting Dashboard – The proposal would also create a publicly accessible online dashboard that tracks all disclosed trades in real time, thereby improving transparency.

Why Now?

The impetus behind the bipartisan push stems from a series of high‑profile incidents over the past two years. The most widely reported case involved Representative Mike Johnson (R‑TN), who reportedly profited $5 million from a short position in a pandemic‑related medical company shortly after the House passed a relevant bill. The incident sparked outrage on both sides of the aisle, and it prompted the House Ethics Committee to investigate.

The new proposals also tie into broader concerns about the COVID‑19 pandemic and the “stimulus” bills that followed. The “Paycheck Protection Program” (PPP) and the “American Rescue Plan” saw a flurry of insider trading by some lawmakers, leading to a perception that the STOCK Act was insufficient. By forcing real‑time disclosure, lawmakers hope to blunt the influence of privileged information on the market.

Reactions from Stakeholders

• House and Senate Leadership: Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer both voiced support for the bill, citing a need to restore public trust. The Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, while acknowledging the legitimacy of the concerns, urged caution to avoid “government overreach.”

• SEC’s Response: The SEC’s current policy, according to the article’s linked page, states that it has limited enforcement of the STOCK Act due to resource constraints. The new proposals would push the SEC to allocate additional staff to investigate and prosecute violations.

• Industry Viewpoints: Major financial firms, such as Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, issued statements expressing their willingness to cooperate with new oversight, while cautioning against what they called “overly restrictive” trading bans that could hamper legitimate economic activity.

• Public Sentiment: Opinion polls referenced in the video show that 68% of Americans support stricter regulations on congressional trading. Social media discussions highlight a strong demand for accountability and a call for lawmakers to “lead by example.”

Additional Context from the Links

The NBC Washington piece included a link to the official text of the STOCK Act (congress.gov), which provides a legal framework for the proposed amendments. It also linked to a “SEC Enforcement Tracker” page, where readers could see the SEC’s most recent enforcement actions. Another link led to a documentary‑style interview with former House Ethics Committee staffers, offering background on why the law’s enforcement has been lax.

In addition to the legal links, the article cited a 2020 New York Times investigation that revealed a pattern of “inconsistent disclosure” by several lawmakers. This investigative piece provided a critical backdrop for the urgency of the new proposals.

What’s Next?

According to the video, the amendment package will first be reviewed by the Senate’s Banking Committee and the House’s Financial Services Committee. Both committees are expected to hold hearings in the coming weeks, where lawmakers will testify on the merits and potential drawbacks of the proposed changes. The amendments are slated for a floor vote in both chambers later this year, with the expectation that a bipartisan consensus will be reached.

If passed, the new rules would create a stricter legal environment for congressional trading—one that could dramatically reduce the public perception of conflict of interest and potentially set a new standard for other branches of government. Whether the amendments will meet the high expectations set by both the public and the bipartisan coalition remains to be seen, but the momentum is unmistakably there.

Bottom Line

The NBC Washington video highlighted an unprecedented bipartisan initiative aimed at redefining the way Congress interacts with the stock market. By tightening disclosure timelines, instituting cool‑off periods, and creating robust enforcement mechanisms, lawmakers hope to turn the STOCK Act from a symbolic piece of legislation into a practical tool for safeguarding public trust. With significant public support and growing evidence of loopholes in the current law, the proposed changes represent a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation about ethics, transparency, and accountability in Washington.