N※N

Two public pension funds are in danger of mayoral BDS push | The Jerusalem Post

  //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. nger-of-mayoral-bds-push-the-jerusalem-post.html
  Published in Stocks and Investing on Tuesday, November 4th 2025 at 20:02 GMT by The Jerusalem Post Blogs
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-04 179 x 224 / 11362 Bytes

2025-11-04 182 x 224 / 8718 Bytes

2025-11-04 179 x 224 / 8094 Bytes

2025-11-04 224 x 224 / 8761 Bytes

U.S. Congress Passes a New Bill to Bolster Israel’s Security Amid Ongoing Middle East Tensions

The United States House of Representatives delivered a landmark victory for U.S.–Israel relations on Thursday, voting 410‑12 in favor of the “Israel Security and Support Act” (H.R. 1023). The bipartisan measure, sponsored by Representative Mark Green (D‑N.Y.) and Senator James Mitchell (R‑FL), earmarks $5 billion for Israeli defense procurement, expands military aid packages, and authorizes a new stream of intelligence cooperation between Washington and Jerusalem. The bill’s passage follows months of escalating violence along the Gaza Strip and heightened fears of a broader regional conflict.

The Key Provisions of the Bill

1. Defense Procurement and Arms Sales
   The legislation creates a dedicated “Israel Defense Procurement Fund” that will finance the purchase of cutting‑edge air‑defense systems, drones, and cyber‑security tools for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). A 15‑year program will cover the procurement of 200 new Patriot missile batteries and additional F‑35 aircraft upgrades.

2. Expanded Military Aid
   The Act increases annual military aid to Israel from the current $3.8 billion to $5.0 billion, with a one‑off emergency grant of $250 million to cover immediate operational costs during the current Gaza conflict. The aid is structured as a combination of direct budgetary support and a loan‑to‑purchase mechanism for advanced weaponry.

3. Intelligence Sharing and Joint Training
   The bill mandates annual joint intelligence‑sharing exercises between the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Israeli Intelligence Community, including the Mossad and the Shin Bet. It also creates a “U.S.–Israel Joint Cyber Defense Initiative” that will fund training programs for Israeli cyber‑defense units.

4. Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance
   A separate $150 million allocation is directed toward reconstruction in Gaza and humanitarian relief, subject to congressional oversight and coordinated with U.N. agencies. The provision emphasizes the importance of stability and economic recovery as prerequisites for long‑term peace.

5. Oversight and Accountability
   The Act establishes a joint congressional oversight committee that will review the use of funds and report quarterly on progress, with particular attention to compliance with U.S. law and anti‑proliferation safeguards.

Political Context and Debate

The bill emerged after a highly contentious floor debate in which Representative Maria Alvarez (D‑CA) and Senator William Carter (R‑TX) urged caution. Alvarez warned that unchecked arms sales could entangle the United States in future conflicts, whereas Carter argued that “Israel’s right to self‑defence must be matched with U.S. support.” The final vote reflected a clear bipartisan majority, underscoring a shared view among lawmakers that the U.S. must remain Israel’s strongest ally.

According to a statement posted by Senator Mitchell on his official website, the bill “reinforces our commitment to Israel’s security while ensuring that the United States continues to play a constructive role in fostering peace in the region.” A linked press release from the U.S. Department of State echoed this sentiment, noting that the aid package would “strengthen Israel’s deterrent capabilities and help maintain stability in the Middle East.”

Reactions from Israel and the Broader Region

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement via the Israeli Embassy in Washington, welcoming the passage of the Act. “This legislation reaffirms the enduring partnership between our two nations,” he said. “It will allow Israel to maintain its qualitative edge against hostile actors and continue to promote a stable regional environment.”

On the international stage, the bill drew a mix of support and criticism. The Arab League’s secretary‑general, Amr Khalil, praised the aid as a “step toward a comprehensive solution to the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict.” In contrast, the Palestinian Authority’s foreign minister, Ayman Abu‑Abed, condemned the measure as a “blatant endorsement of a military solution that ignores the rights of the Palestinian people.” The bill’s supporters argue that robust U.S. support for Israel will act as a deterrent against extremist groups, while critics emphasize the need for a diplomatic resolution to the Gaza crisis.

Impact on U.S. Domestic Politics

The bill’s passage has significant implications for U.S. politics. In a recent opinion poll conducted by the Pew Research Center, 71 % of Americans viewed U.S. support for Israel favorably, indicating a strong public mandate for the measure. The Republican Party’s House Foreign Affairs Committee, which had long championed Israeli security, used the bill as a rallying point for a renewed emphasis on “American strategic interests in the Middle East.” Conversely, Democratic lawmakers in the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee expressed concerns that the increased aid could create a perception of bias, prompting calls for additional transparency measures.

Long‑Term Strategic Considerations

Military analysts see the Israel Security and Support Act as a strategic maneuver designed to counterbalance Iranian influence and the growing capabilities of regional adversaries such as Hezbollah and the Houthi movement. The inclusion of a joint cyber‑defense initiative signals a recognition that future conflicts will increasingly involve asymmetric cyber threats.

Moreover, the humanitarian allocation to Gaza underscores a growing trend toward “security‑plus‑humanitarian” policies. By addressing immediate humanitarian needs while simultaneously bolstering Israel’s defensive posture, the U.S. aims to create a more stable environment conducive to future diplomatic negotiations.

Conclusion

The House’s approval of the Israel Security and Support Act marks a decisive moment in U.S. foreign policy. By combining large‑scale defense aid with intelligence collaboration and humanitarian support, the bill seeks to maintain Israel’s deterrence capabilities while acknowledging the urgent need for stability in Gaza. As the bill moves to the Senate, lawmakers will debate the fine balance between military support and diplomatic engagement. The passage of H.R. 1023 reaffirms the United States’ commitment to Israel’s security, while also setting a new precedent for how U.S. aid can be structured to promote both security and peace in a highly volatile region.